↓ Skip to main content

Corneal Edema and Opacification Preferred Practice Pattern®

Overview of attention for article published in Ophthalmology, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Corneal Edema and Opacification Preferred Practice Pattern®
Published in
Ophthalmology, October 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.10.022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marjan Farid, Michelle K. Rhee, Esen K. Akpek, Guillermo Amescua, Francisco J. Garcia-Ferrer, Amy Lin, Divya M. Varu, David C. Musch, Francis S. Mah, Steven P. Dunn, American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern Cornea and External Disease Panel

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Other 11 10%
Student > Master 8 8%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 47 45%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 54 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,359,319
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Ophthalmology
#2,640
of 6,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,299
of 362,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ophthalmology
#43
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.