↓ Skip to main content

HIV-induced syncytia of a T cell line form single giant pseudopods and are motile

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cell Science, November 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
HIV-induced syncytia of a T cell line form single giant pseudopods and are motile
Published in
Journal of Cell Science, November 1993
DOI 10.1242/jcs.106.3.941
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The human immunodeficiency virus, HIV, induces syncytium formation in cultures of many T cell lines. These syncytia have previously been viewed as disorganized fusion products in the throes of death. Evidence is presented that in HIV1-infected SupT1 cultures, syncytia five times to over one hundred times larger than single cells organize their many nuclei into blastula-like balls, reorganize their cytoskeleton to mimic that of a single cell, and extend single, giant pseudopods in a polar fashion. Medium-sized syncytia are capable of translocation through extension of these giant pseudopods. The rate of translocation of syncytia is comparable to that of single cells. Single cell motility, syncytium motility and pseudopod extension also appear to play roles in the recruitment of cells into syncytia. Finally, condensation of F-actin at cell-syncytium and syncytium-syncytium adhesion sites suggests the involvement of the cytoskeleton in the adhesion and/or subsequent fusion event. These results suggest that the fusion events involved in HIV-induced syncytia formation involve both cell motility and reorganization of the cytoskeleton, and demonstrate that syncytia are highly organized, motile entities.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Professor 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 39%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Mathematics 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2026.
All research outputs
#5,005,371
of 23,948,870 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cell Science
#1,731
of 8,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,638
of 22,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cell Science
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,948,870 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.