↓ Skip to main content

Hyporheic zone hydrological processes

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrological Processes, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hyporheic zone hydrological processes
Published in
Hydrological Processes, January 2000
DOI 10.1002/1099-1085(20001030)14:15<2797::aid-hyp402>3.0.co;2-6
Authors

Kenneth E Bencala

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 147 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 21%
Researcher 30 19%
Professor 11 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 7%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 18 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 56 35%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 47 30%
Engineering 17 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Sports and Recreations 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 26 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,561,005
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Hydrological Processes
#693
of 1,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,470
of 108,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrological Processes
#9
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.