↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating Warm-Up Strategies for Elite Sprint Breaststroke Swimming Performance.

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evaluating Warm-Up Strategies for Elite Sprint Breaststroke Swimming Performance.
Published in
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, August 2016
DOI 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0581
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Targeted passive heating and completion of dryland-based activation exercises within the warm-up can enhance sprint freestyle performance. We investigated if these interventions would also elicit improvements in sprint breaststroke swimming performance. Ten national and internationally competitive swimmers (~805 FINA2014 scoring points; 6 male, 20 ± 1 yr; 4 female, 21 ± 3 yr) completed a standardized pool warm-up (1550 m) followed by a 30 min transition and a 100 m breaststroke time-trial. Within transition, swimmers wore a conventional tracksuit and remained seated (Control) or wore tracksuit pants with integrated heating elements and performed a 5 min dryland-based exercise routine (Combo) in a cross-over design. 100 m time-trial performance (Control: 68.6 ± 4.0 s; mean ± SD; Combo: 68.4 ± 3.9 s; P = 0.55) and start times to 15 m (Control: 7.3 ± 0.6 s; Combo: 7.3 ± 0.6 s; P = 0.81) were not different between conditions. It was unclear (P = 0.36) whether Combo (-0.12 ± 0.19ºC; mean ± 90% confidence limits) elicited an improvement in core temperature maintenance within transition compared to Control (-0.31 ± 0.19ºC). Skin temperature immediately prior to time-trial commencement was higher (by ~1ºC, P = 0.01) within Combo (30.13 ± 0.88 ºC; mean ± SD) compared to Control (29.11 ± 1.20 ºC). Lower-body power output was not different between conditions pre time-trial. Targeted passive heating and completion of dryland-based activation exercises within transition does not enhance sprint breaststroke performance despite eliciting elevated skin temperature immediately prior to time-trial commencement.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Student > Master 8 8%
Researcher 5 5%
Lecturer 3 3%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 38 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 31 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Psychology 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 41 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2016.
All research outputs
#6,183,309
of 33,977,172 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
#1,050
of 2,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,494
of 341,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
#48
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,977,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.