↓ Skip to main content

Osseointegrated total knee replacement connected to a lower limb prosthesis: 4 cases

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Orthopaedica, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Osseointegrated total knee replacement connected to a lower limb prosthesis: 4 cases
Published in
Acta Orthopaedica, August 2015
DOI 10.3109/17453674.2015.1068635
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Background and purpose - Osseointegrated implants are an alternative for prosthetic attachment in individuals with amputation who are unable to wear a socket. However, the load transmitted through the osseointegrated fixation to the residual tibia and knee joint can be unbearable for those with transtibial amputation and knee arthritis. We report on the feasibility of combining total knee replacement (TKR) with an osseointegrated implant for prosthetic attachment. Patients and methods - We retrospectively reviewed all 4 cases (aged 38-77 years) of transtibial amputations managed with osseointegration and TKR in 2012-2014. The below-the-knee prosthesis was connected to the tibial base plate of a TKR, enabling the tibial residuum and knee joint to act as weight-sharing structures. A 2-stage procedure involved connecting a standard hinged TKR to custom-made implants and creation of a skin-implant interface. Clinical outcomes were assessed at baseline and after 1-3 years of follow-up using standard measures of health-related quality of life, ambulation, and activity level including the questionnaire for transfemoral amputees (Q-TFA) and the 6-minute walk test. Results - There were no major complications, and there was 1 case of superficial infection. All patients showed improved clinical outcomes, with a Q-TFA improvement range of 29-52 and a 6-minute walk test improvement range of 37-84 meters. Interpretation - It is possible to combine TKR with osseointegrated implants.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 156 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Other 17 11%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 50 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 26%
Engineering 29 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Psychology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 57 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,227,170
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Acta Orthopaedica
#294
of 882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,163
of 267,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Orthopaedica
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.