↓ Skip to main content

Shallow seismic imaging of folds above the Puente Hills blind‐thrust fault, Los Angeles, California

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, May 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shallow seismic imaging of folds above the Puente Hills blind‐thrust fault, Los Angeles, California
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, May 2002
DOI 10.1029/2001gl014313
Authors

Thomas L. Pratt, John H. Shaw, James F. Dolan, Shari A. Christofferson, Robert A. Williams, Jack K. Odum, Andreas Plesch

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 3%
China 1 3%
Hong Kong 1 3%
Unknown 32 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 30%
Researcher 11 30%
Other 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 29 78%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Unknown 7 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2022.
All research outputs
#8,254,039
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#10,006
of 20,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,033
of 125,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#37
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.