↓ Skip to main content

Charge, Size, and Cellular Selectivity for Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes by Maize and Soybean

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Charge, Size, and Cellular Selectivity for Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes by Maize and Soybean
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, June 2015
DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b01145
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Maize (Zea mays) and Soybean (Glycine max) were used as model food-chain plants to explore vegetative uptake of differently charged multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). Three types of MWCNTs, including neutral pristine MWCNT (p-MWCNT), positively charged MWCNT-NH2 and negatively charged MWCNT-COOH, were directly taken-up and translocated from hydroponic solution to roots, stems and leaves of the maize and soybean at the MWCNT concentrations ranging from 10.0 to 50.0 mg/L during 18-day exposures. MWCNTs accumulated in the xylem and phloem cells, and within specific intracellular sites like the cytoplasm, cell wall, cell membrane, chloroplast and mitochondria which was observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). MWCNTs stimulated the growth of maize and inhibited the growth of soybean at the exposed doses. The cumulative transpiration of water in maize exposed to 50 mg/L of MWCNT-COOHs was almost twice as much as that in the maize control. Dry biomass of maize exposed to MWCNTs was greater than that of maize control. In addition, the uptake and translocation of these MWCNTs clearly exhibited cellular, charge and size selectivity in maize and soybean, which could be important properties for nanotransporters. This is the first report of cellular, charge and size selectivity on the uptake by whole food plants for three differently charged MWCNTs.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 89 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Student > Master 12 13%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 37 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 16%
Environmental Science 7 8%
Chemistry 6 7%
Engineering 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 39 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2016.
All research outputs
#24,639,802
of 27,376,552 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#20,980
of 22,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,966
of 283,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#257
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,376,552 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.