↓ Skip to main content

Pathology of Breast and Ovarian Cancers among BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: Results from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA)

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
501 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pathology of Breast and Ovarian Cancers among BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: Results from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA)
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, January 2012
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-11-0775
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nasim Mavaddat, Daniel Barrowdale, Irene L. Andrulis, Susan M. Domchek, Diana Eccles, Heli Nevanlinna, Susan J. Ramus, Amanda Spurdle, Mark Robson, Mark Sherman, Anna Marie Mulligan, Fergus J. Couch, Christoph Engel, Lesley McGuffog, Sue Healey, Olga M. Sinilnikova, Melissa C. Southey, Mary Beth Terry, David Goldgar, Frances O'Malley, Esther M. John, Ramunas Janavicius, Laima Tihomirova, Thomas V. O. Hansen, Finn C. Nielsen, Ana Osorio, Alexandra Stavropoulou, Javier Benítez, Siranoush Manoukian, Bernard Peissel, Monica Barile, Sara Volorio, Barbara Pasini, Riccardo Dolcetti, Anna Laura Putignano, Laura Ottini, Paolo Radice, Ute Hamann, Muhammad U. Rashid, Frans B. Hogervorst, Mieke Kriege, Rob B. van der Luijt, for HEBON, Susan Peock, Debra Frost, D. Gareth Evans, Carole Brewer, Lisa Walker, Mark T. Rogers, Lucy E. Side, Catherine Houghton, for EMBRACE, JoEllen Weaver, Andrew K. Godwin, Rita K. Schmutzler, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Alfons Meindl, Karin Kast, Norbert Arnold, Dieter Niederacher, Christian Sutter, Helmut Deissler, Doroteha Gadzicki, Sabine Preisler-Adams, Raymonda Varon-Mateeva, Ines Schönbuchner, Heidrun Gevensleben, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Muriel Belotti, Laure Barjhoux, for GEMO Study Collaborators, Claudine Isaacs, Beth N. Peshkin, Trinidad Caldes, Miguel de la Hoya, Carmen Cañadas, Tuomas Heikkinen, Päivi Heikkilä, Kristiina Aittomäki, Ignacio Blanco, Conxi Lazaro, Joan Brunet, Bjarni A. Agnarsson, Adalgeir Arason, Rosa B. Barkardottir, Martine Dumont, Jacques Simard, Marco Montagna, Simona Agata, Emma D'Andrea, Max Yan, Stephen Fox, for kConFab Investigators, Timothy R. Rebbeck, Wendy Rubinstein, Nadine Tung, Judy E. Garber, Xianshu Wang, Zachary Fredericksen, Vernon S. Pankratz, Noralane M. Lindor, Csilla Szabo, Kenneth Offit, Rita Sakr, Mia M. Gaudet, Christian F. Singer, Muy-Kheng Tea, Christine Rappaport, Phuong L., Mark H. Greene, Anna Sokolenko, Evgeny Imyanitov, Amanda Ewart Toland, Leigha Senter, Kevin Sweet, Mads Thomassen, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Torben Kruse, Maria Caligo, Paolo Aretini, Johanna Rantala, Anna von Wachenfeld, Karin Henriksson, for SWE-BRCA Collaborators, Linda Steele, Susan L. Neuhausen, Robert Nussbaum, Mary Beattie, Kunle Odunsi, Lara Sucheston, Simon A. Gayther, Kate Nathanson, Jenny Gross, Christine Walsh, Beth Karlan, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Douglas F. Easton, Antonis C. Antoniou, for the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 501 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 490 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 69 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 11%
Student > Bachelor 52 10%
Student > Master 48 10%
Other 27 5%
Other 86 17%
Unknown 165 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 148 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 81 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 10%
Social Sciences 7 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 <1%
Other 34 7%
Unknown 177 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,821,769
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#555
of 5,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,747
of 301,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#5
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.