↓ Skip to main content

ハナビルDinobdella feroxの鼻腔内寄生の1症例

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of UOEH, January 1988
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 207)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ハナビルDinobdella feroxの鼻腔内寄生の1症例
Published in
Journal of UOEH, January 1988
DOI 10.7888/juoeh.10.203
Pubmed ID
Authors

真喜屋 清, 塚本 増久, 堀尾 政博, 黒田 嘉紀

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,342,677
of 25,804,096 outputs
Outputs from Journal of UOEH
#10
of 207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#868
of 50,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of UOEH
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,804,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 207 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them