↓ Skip to main content

5-Hydroxymethylcytosine Marks Sites of DNA Damage and Promotes Genome Stability

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Reports, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
284 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
5-Hydroxymethylcytosine Marks Sites of DNA Damage and Promotes Genome Stability
Published in
Cell Reports, February 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.01.035
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) is a DNA base created during active DNA demethylation by the recently discovered TET enzymes. 5hmC has essential roles in gene expression and differentiation. Here, we demonstrate that 5hmC also localizes to sites of DNA damage and repair. 5hmC accumulates at damage foci induced by aphidicolin and microirradiation and colocalizes with major DNA damage response proteins 53BP1 and γH2AX, revealing 5hmC as an epigenetic marker of DNA damage. Deficiency for the TET enzymes eliminates damage-induced 5hmC accumulation and elicits chromosome segregation defects in response to replication stress. Our results indicate that the TET enzymes and 5hmC play essential roles in ensuring genome integrity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 278 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 27%
Researcher 56 20%
Student > Master 25 9%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 32 11%
Unknown 55 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 106 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 2%
Chemistry 7 2%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 56 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2016.
All research outputs
#869,296
of 33,977,172 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#1,672
of 16,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,474
of 452,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#42
of 261 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,977,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 261 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.