↓ Skip to main content

Triaging Psychiatric Care: Risk Assessment Construction and Validation for Washington’s Involuntary Treatment and Forensic Commitment Populations

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Triaging Psychiatric Care: Risk Assessment Construction and Validation for Washington’s Involuntary Treatment and Forensic Commitment Populations
Published in
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, February 2016
DOI 10.1177/0306624x16628237
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is a growing need in Washington to triage patients being considered for inpatient treatment. There has previously been no risk assessment normed to persons with mental illness in the State of Washington. The Static Risk Assessment (SRA) is used in Washington to assess risk among offenders under State Department of Corrections supervision. The present study sought to create and validate a new risk assessment, the SRA for Mental Health Patients (SRA-MHP), for two mental health populations in Washington. A sample of 16,289 patients involuntarily committed due to being deemed dangerous or gravely disabled, as well as a sample of 8,713 forensic patients undergoing a competency evaluation to stand trial after being charged with a crime, was gathered to assess the utility in applying the SRA-MHP to persons with mental illness. Results indicate that the SRA-MHP has high predictive performance for these samples.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 18 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 30%
Social Sciences 7 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 21 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2016.
All research outputs
#15,479,396
of 24,995,564 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
#766
of 1,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,119
of 408,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
#14
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,995,564 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.