↓ Skip to main content

High-Resolution Optical Coherence Tomography Findings of Lisch Epithelial Corneal Dystrophy

Overview of attention for article published in Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
High-Resolution Optical Coherence Tomography Findings of Lisch Epithelial Corneal Dystrophy
Published in
Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease, March 2016
DOI 10.1097/ico.0000000000000722
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To describe a case of Lisch epithelial corneal dystrophy (LECD) and present its unique characteristics on high-resolution optical coherence tomography (HR-OCT). A 78-year-old man with whorled corneal epithelial opacities in the right eye was referred for the evaluation of ocular surface squamous neoplasia. Clinical evaluation, photographs, and HR-OCT images of the cornea involved were obtained and scrapings of the affected cornea were sent for histopathologic analysis. Clinically, the patient presented with an opalescent whirling epithelium in a linear pattern encroaching on the visual axis. HR-OCT showed normal thickness epithelial hyperreflectivity of involved cornea without stromal involvement, along with sharply demarcated borders of unaffected tissue. Histopathologic findings demonstrated vacuolated periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) positive cells throughout the epithelial layers consistent with LECD. HR-OCT was able to provide useful information to rule out ocular surface squamous neoplasia and confirm the clinical impression of LECD at the time of clinical examination. HR-OCT shows promise as an adjunctive diagnostic tool for ocular surface lesions and pathologies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 4 22%
Unknown 6 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2017.
All research outputs
#11,914,949
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease
#903
of 4,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,019
of 336,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease
#15
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.