↓ Skip to main content

Bait uptake by wild badgers and its implications for oral vaccination against tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bait uptake by wild badgers and its implications for oral vaccination against tuberculosis
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2018
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0206136
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Researcher 7 6%
Student > Master 3 3%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 72 61%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 70 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2025.
All research outputs
#9,306,918
of 28,041,331 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#132,564
of 243,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,739
of 365,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,493
of 3,249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,041,331 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 243,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.