| Title |
DNA-Catalyzed Amide Hydrolysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American Chemical Society, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1021/jacs.5b12647 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cong Zhou, Joshua L. Avins, Paul C. Klauser, Benjamin M. Brandsen, Yujeong Lee, Scott K. Silverman |
| Abstract |
DNA catalysts (deoxyribozymes) for a variety of reactions have been identified by in vitro selection. However, for certain reactions this identification has not been achieved. One important example is DNA-catalyzed amide hydrolysis, for which a previous selection experiment instead led to DNA-catalyzed DNA phosphodiester hydrolysis. Subsequent efforts in which the selection strategy deliberately avoided phosphodiester hydrolysis led to DNA-catalyzed ester and aromatic amide hydrolysis, but aliphatic amide hydrolysis has been elusive. In the present study, we show that including modified nucleotides that bear protein-like functional groups (any one of primary amino, carboxyl, or primary hydroxyl) enables identification of amide-hydrolyzing deoxyribozymes. In one case, the same deoxyribozyme sequence without the modifications still retained substantial catalytic activity. Overall, these findings establish the utility of introducing protein-like functional groups into deoxyribozymes for identifying new catalytic function. The results also suggest the longer-term feasiblity of deoxyribozymes as artificial proteases. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 54% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 62% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 30% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 26% |
| Unknown | 7 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 40 | 49% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 12 | 15% |