↓ Skip to main content

Psychometric Testing of the Health Care Evidence-Based Practice Assessment Tool

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of nursing measurement, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Psychometric Testing of the Health Care Evidence-Based Practice Assessment Tool
Published in
Journal of nursing measurement, January 2015
DOI 10.1891/1061-3749.23.3.485
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is essential to optimal health care outcomes. Interventions to improve use of evidence depend on accurate assessments from reliable, valid, and user-friendly tools. This study reports psychometric analyses from a modified version of a widely used EBP questionnaire, the information literacy for nursing practice (ILNP). After content validity assessments by nurse researchers, a convenience sample of 2,439 nurses completed the revised 23-item questionnaire. We examined internal consistency and used factor analyses to assess the factor structure. A modified 4-factor model demonstrated adequate fit to the data. Cronbach's alpha was .80-.92 for the subscales. The shortened ILNP (renamed Healthcare EBP Assessment Tool or HEAT) demonstrated adequate content validity, construct validity, and reliability.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Librarian 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 25%
Social Sciences 3 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2016.
All research outputs
#31,182,611
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from Journal of nursing measurement
#140
of 154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#360,363
of 409,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of nursing measurement
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.