↓ Skip to main content

CureGN Study Rationale, Design, and Methods: Establishing a Large Prospective Observational Study of Glomerular Disease

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Kidney Diseases, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
CureGN Study Rationale, Design, and Methods: Establishing a Large Prospective Observational Study of Glomerular Disease
Published in
American Journal of Kidney Diseases, November 2018
DOI 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.07.020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura H. Mariani, Andrew S. Bomback, Pietro A. Canetta, Michael F. Flessner, Margaret Helmuth, Michelle A. Hladunewich, Jonathan J. Hogan, Krzysztof Kiryluk, Patrick H. Nachman, Cynthia C. Nast, Michelle N. Rheault, Dana V. Rizk, Howard Trachtman, Scott E. Wenderfer, Corinna Bowers, Peg Hill-Callahan, Maddalena Marasa, Caroline J. Poulton, Adelaide Revell, Suzanne Vento, Laura Barisoni, Dan Cattran, Vivette D’Agati, J. Charles Jennette, Jon B. Klein, Louis-Philippe Laurin, Katherine Twombley, Ronald J. Falk, Ali G. Gharavi, Brenda W. Gillespie, Debbie S. Gipson, Larry A. Greenbaum, Lawrence B. Holzman, Matthias Kretzler, Bruce Robinson, William E. Smoyer, Lisa M. Guay-Woodford, CureGN Consortium, Wooin Ahn, Gerald B. Appel, Revekka Babayev, Ibrahim Batal, Andrew S. Bomback, Eric Brown, Eric S. Campenot, Pietro Canetta, Lucrezia Carlassara, Brenda Chan, Debanjana Chatterjee, Vivette D. D’Agati, Elisa Delbarba, Samriti Dogra, Hilda Fernandez, Bartosz Foroncewicz, Ali G. Gharavi, Gian Marco Ghiggeri, William H. Hines, S. Ali Husain, Namrata G. Jain, Pascale Khairallah, Byum Hee Kil, Krzysztof Kiryluk, Anushya Jeyabalan, Wai L. Lau, Fangming Lin, Francesca Lugani, Maddalena Marasa, Glen Markowitz, Sumit Mohan, Xueru Mu, Krzysztof Mucha, Thomas L. Nickolas, Stacy Piva, Jai Radhakrishnan, Maya K. Rao, Renu Regunathan-Shenk, Simone Sanna-Cherchi, Dominick Santoriello, Shayan Shirazian, Michael B. Stokes, Natalie Yu, Anthony M. Valeri, Ronald Zviti, Larry A. Greenbaum, William E. Smoyer, Amira Al-Uzri, Josephine Ambruzs, Isa Ashoor, Diego Aviles, Rossana Baracco, John Barcia, Sharon Bartosh, Craig Belsha, Corinna Bowers, Michael C. Braun, Yi Cai, Vladimir Chernitskiy, Aftab Chishti, Donna Claes, Kira Clark, Carl Cramer, Keefe Davis, Amy Dutcher, Elif Erkan, Daniel Feig, Michael Freundlich, Joseph Gaut, Rasheed Gbadegesin, Melisha Hanna, Guillermo Hidalgo, David Hooper, Tracy E. Hunley, Amrish Jain, Mahmoud Kallash, Margo Kamel, Myda Khalid, Jon B. Klein, Theresa Kump, Jerome C. Lane, Helen Liapis, John Mahan, Nisha Mathews, Carla Nester, Cynthia Pan, Larry Patterson, Hiren Patel, Alice Raad, Adelaide Revell, Michelle N. Rheault, Cynthia Silva, Rajasree Sreedharan, Tarak Srivastava, Julia Steinke, Susan Sumner, Katherine Twombley, Scott E. Wenderfer, Tetyana L. Vasylyeva, Chia-shi Wang, Donald J. Weaver, Craig S. Wong, Hong Yin, Anand Achanti, Salem Almaani, Isabelle Ayoub, Milos Budisavljevic, Maggie D'Angelo, Vimal Derebail, Huma Fatima, Ronald Falk, Agnes Fogo, Keisha Gibson, Dorey Glenn, Susan Hogan, Koyal Jain, J. Charles Jennette, Bruce Julian, Jason Kidd, Louis-Philippe Laurin, H. Davis Massey, Amy Mottl, Shannon Murphy, Tibor Nadasdy, Jan Novak, Samir Parikh, Caroline Poulton, Thomas Brian Powell, Bryce Reeve, Matthew Renfrow, Monica Reynolds, Dana Rizk, Brad Rovin, Virginie Royal, Manish Saha, Neil Sanghani, Sally Self, Sharon Adler, Nada Alachkar, Charles Alpers, Raed Bou Matar, Carmen Avila-Casado, Serena Bagnasco, Emily Brede, Elizabeth Brown, Daniel Cattran, Michael Choi, Gabriel Contreras, Katherine M. Dell, Darren Dewalt, Michelle Denburg, Ram Dukkipati, Fernando C. Fervenza, Alessia Fornoni, Crystal Gadegbeku, Patrick Gipson, Anny Gonzalez-Zea, Leah Hasely, Elizabeth Hendren, Sangeeta Hingorani, Michelle Hladunewich, Jonathan Hogan, Lawrence B. Holzman, Jean Hou, J. Ashley Jefferson, Kenar Jhaveri, Duncan B. Johnstone, Frederick Kaskel, Amy Kogan, Jeffrey Kopp, Richard Lafayette, Kevin V. Lemley, Laura Malaga-Dieguez, Kevin Meyers, Alicia Neu, Michelle Marie O'Shaughnessy, John F. O’Toole, Andrea Oliverio, Matthew Palmer, Rulan Parekh, Renee Pitter, Heather Reich, Kimberly Reidy, Helbert Rondon, Kamalanathan K. Sambandam, Matthew Sampson, John R. Sedor, David T. Selewski, Christine B. Sethna, Jeffrey Schelling, John C. Sperati, Agnes Swiatecka-Urban, Howard Trachtman, Katherine R. Tuttle, Meryl Waldman, Joseph Weisstuch, Roger Wiggins, David Williams, Cheryl Winkler, Suzanne Vento, Eric Young, Olga Zhdanova, Laura Barisoni, Charlotte Beil, Richard Eikstadt, Brenda Gillespie, Debbie S. Gipson, John Graff, Stephen Hewitt, Peg Hill-Callahan, Margaret Helmuth, Emily Herreshoff, Matthias Kretzler, Chrysta Lienczewski, Sarah Mansfield, Laura Mariani, Keith McCullough, Nicholas Moore, Cynthia C. Nast, Bruce M. Robinson, Melissa Sexton, Jonathan Troost, Matthew Wladkowski, Jarcy Zee, Dawn Zinsser, Lisa M. Guay-Woodford

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 131 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 9%
Other 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Student > Master 9 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 61 47%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 62 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,452,406
of 28,815,917 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Kidney Diseases
#697
of 6,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,323
of 367,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Kidney Diseases
#12
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,815,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.