You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
良食味水稲新品種「いちほまれ」の育成
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breeding Research, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1270/jsbbr.18j05 |
| Authors |
Asako Kobayashi, Katsura Tomita, Takeshi Hayashi, Makoto Tanoi, Yoshie Machida, Fumihiro Nakaoka, Kiwamu Sakai, Kazuo Watanabe, Yuusaku Morozumi, Toyohiro Shimizu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,157,383
of 25,171,741 outputs
Outputs from Breeding Research
#5
of 46 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,303
of 449,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breeding Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,171,741 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one scored the same or higher as 41 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them