↓ Skip to main content

Traditional plant functional groups explain variation in economic but not size‐related traits across the tundra biome

Overview of attention for article published in Global Ecology & Biogeography, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 X users

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Traditional plant functional groups explain variation in economic but not size‐related traits across the tundra biome
Published in
Global Ecology & Biogeography, November 2018
DOI 10.1111/geb.12783
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 217 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 15%
Student > Master 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 58 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 37%
Environmental Science 39 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 64 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,938,733
of 34,546,575 outputs
Outputs from Global Ecology & Biogeography
#495
of 2,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,597
of 365,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Ecology & Biogeography
#9
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,546,575 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.