↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of Metal Ion Dependence in glmS Ribozyme Self‐Cleavage and Coenzyme Binding

Overview of attention for article published in ChemBioChem, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Analysis of Metal Ion Dependence in glmS Ribozyme Self‐Cleavage and Coenzyme Binding
Published in
ChemBioChem, November 2010
DOI 10.1002/cbic.201000544
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The bacterial glmS ribozyme is mechanistically unique among both riboswitches and RNA catalysts. Its self-cleavage activity is the basis of riboswitch regulation of glucosamine-6-phosphate (GlcN6P) production, and catalysis requires GlcN6P as a coenzyme. Previous work has shown that the coenzyme amine of GlcN6P is essential for glmS ribozyme self-cleavage, as is its protonation state. Metal ions are also essential within the glmS ribozyme core for both structure and function of the ribozyme. Although metal ions do not directly promote catalysis, we show that metal ion identity and the varying physicochemical properties of metal ions have an impact on the rate of glmS ribozyme self-cleavage. Specifically, these studies demonstrate that metal ion identity influences the overall apparent pK(a) of ribozyme self-cleavage, and metal ion binding largely reflects phosphate oxygen affinity. Results suggest that metal ions take alternative roles in supporting the mechanism of catalysis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 32%
Researcher 5 26%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2011.
All research outputs
#16,718,114
of 24,586,986 outputs
Outputs from ChemBioChem
#3,865
of 5,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,737
of 189,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ChemBioChem
#32
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,586,986 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,917 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.