↓ Skip to main content

Defective Hepatic Autophagy in Obesity Promotes ER Stress and Causes Insulin Resistance

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
615 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Defective Hepatic Autophagy in Obesity Promotes ER Stress and Causes Insulin Resistance
Published in
Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), June 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.04.005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Autophagy is a homeostatic process involved in the bulk degradation of cytoplasmic components, including damaged organelles and proteins. In both genetic and dietary models of obesity, we observed a severe downregulation of autophagy, particularly in Atg7 expression levels in liver. Suppression of Atg7 both in vitro and in vivo resulted in defective insulin signaling and elevated ER stress. In contrast, restoration of the Atg7 expression in liver resulted in dampened ER stress, enhanced hepatic insulin action, and systemic glucose tolerance in obese mice. The beneficial action of Atg7 restoration in obese mice could be completely prevented by blocking a downstream mediator, Atg5, supporting its dependence on autophagy in regulating insulin action. Our data demonstrate that autophagy is an important regulator of organelle function and insulin signaling and that loss of autophagy is a critical component of defective insulin action seen in obesity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 615 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 1%
Japan 4 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 590 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 116 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 109 18%
Student > Master 65 11%
Student > Bachelor 54 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 38 6%
Other 106 17%
Unknown 127 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 192 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 126 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 77 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 2%
Other 41 7%
Unknown 151 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2025.
All research outputs
#2,835,064
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#1,913
of 3,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,503
of 152,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 76.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.