↓ Skip to main content

Transient Non-native Hydrogen Bonds Promote Activation of a Signaling Protein

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Transient Non-native Hydrogen Bonds Promote Activation of a Signaling Protein
Published in
Cell, December 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.022
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Phosphorylation is a common mechanism for activating proteins within signaling pathways. Yet, the molecular transitions between the inactive and active conformational states are poorly understood. Here we quantitatively characterize the free-energy landscape of activation of a signaling protein, nitrogen regulatory protein C (NtrC), by connecting functional protein dynamics of phosphorylation-dependent activation to protein folding and show that only a rarely populated, pre-existing active conformation is energetically stabilized by phosphorylation. Using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) dynamics, we test an atomic scale pathway for the complex conformational transition, inferred from molecular dynamics simulations (Lei et al., 2009). The data show that the loss of native stabilizing contacts during activation is compensated by non-native transient atomic interactions during the transition. The results unravel atomistic details of native-state protein energy landscapes by expanding the knowledge about ground states to transition landscapes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
United Kingdom 5 3%
Canada 4 2%
Turkey 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 160 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 61 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 30%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 5%
Professor 8 4%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 9 5%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 20%
Chemistry 30 16%
Physics and Astronomy 9 5%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 20 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2010.
All research outputs
#6,249,996
of 28,841,988 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#10,786
of 18,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,979
of 194,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#51
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,841,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.