↓ Skip to main content

Viral Glycosphingolipids Induce Lytic Infection and Cell Death in Marine Phytoplankton

Overview of attention for article published in Science, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Viral Glycosphingolipids Induce Lytic Infection and Cell Death in Marine Phytoplankton
Published in
Science, November 2009
DOI 10.1126/science.1177322
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Marine viruses that infect phytoplankton are recognized as a major ecological and evolutionary driving force, shaping community structure and nutrient cycling in the marine environment. Little is known about the signal transduction pathways mediating viral infection. We show that viral glycosphingolipids regulate infection of Emiliania huxleyi, a cosmopolitan coccolithophore that plays a major role in the global carbon cycle. These sphingolipids derive from an unprecedented cluster of biosynthetic genes in Coccolithovirus genomes, are synthesized de novo during lytic infection, and are enriched in virion membranes. Purified glycosphingolipids induced biochemical hallmarks of programmed cell death in an uninfected host. These lipids were detected in coccolithophore populations in the North Atlantic, which highlights their potential as biomarkers for viral infection in the oceans.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
Canada 3 1%
Japan 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 246 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 25%
Researcher 53 20%
Student > Master 29 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 55 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 108 40%
Environmental Science 32 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 26 10%
Chemistry 6 2%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 62 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2025.
All research outputs
#2,148,633
of 28,841,988 outputs
Outputs from Science
#29,420
of 87,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,796
of 120,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#120
of 400 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,841,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 87,351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 400 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.