↓ Skip to main content

Central but not systemic administration of XPro1595 is therapeutic following moderate spinal cord injury in mice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Central but not systemic administration of XPro1595 is therapeutic following moderate spinal cord injury in mice
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12974-014-0159-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 17%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 12%
Neuroscience 10 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 23 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#6,646,467
of 34,054,827 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#1,240
of 3,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,448
of 280,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#8
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,054,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.