↓ Skip to main content

Diversity across major and candidate genes in European local pig breeds

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diversity across major and candidate genes in European local pig breeds
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2018
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0207475
Pubmed ID
Authors

María Muñoz, Riccardo Bozzi, Fabián García, Yolanda Núñez, Claudia Geraci, Alessandro Crovetti, Juan García-Casco, Estefania Alves, Martin Škrlep, Rui Charneca, Jose M. Martins, Raquel Quintanilla, Joan Tibau, Goran Kušec, Ivona Djurkin-Kušec, Marie J. Mercat, Juliette Riquet, Jordi Estellé, Christoph Zimmer, Violeta Razmaite, Jose P. Araujo, Čedomir Radović, Radomir Savić, Danijel Karolyi, Maurizio Gallo, Marjeta Čandek-Potokar, Luca Fontanesi, Ana I. Fernández, Cristina Óvilo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 22%
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 20 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 7%
Unspecified 1 1%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,975,048
of 24,380,426 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#49,191
of 210,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,466
of 445,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#809
of 3,162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,380,426 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.