↓ Skip to main content

Sensory Signaling-Dependent Remodeling of Olfactory Cilia Architecture in C. elegans

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Cell, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sensory Signaling-Dependent Remodeling of Olfactory Cilia Architecture in C. elegans
Published in
Developmental Cell, May 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.03.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Nonmotile primary cilia are sensory organelles composed of a microtubular axoneme and a surrounding membrane sheath that houses signaling molecules. Optimal cellular function requires the precise regulation of axoneme assembly, membrane biogenesis, and signaling protein targeting and localization via as yet poorly understood mechanisms. Here, we show that sensory signaling is required to maintain the architecture of the specialized AWB olfactory neuron cilia in C. elegans. Decreased sensory signaling results in alteration of axoneme length and expansion of a membraneous structure, thereby altering the topological distribution of a subset of ciliary transmembrane signaling molecules. Signaling-regulated alteration of ciliary structures can be bypassed by modulation of intracellular cGMP or calcium levels and requires kinesin-II-driven intraflagellar transport (IFT), as well as BBS- and RAB8-related proteins. Our results suggest that compensatory mechanisms in response to altered levels of sensory activity modulate AWB cilia architecture, revealing remarkable plasticity in the regulation of cilia structure.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 109 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 23%
Professor 12 10%
Student > Master 9 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 25%
Neuroscience 11 10%
Engineering 5 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 16 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2008.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Cell
#3,490
of 4,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,225
of 89,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Cell
#22
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.