↓ Skip to main content

Modulation of GABAA receptor desensitization uncouples sleep onset and maintenance in Drosophila

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Modulation of GABAA receptor desensitization uncouples sleep onset and maintenance in Drosophila
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, January 2008
DOI 10.1038/nn2046
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Many lines of evidence indicate that GABA and GABA(A) receptors make important contributions to human sleep regulation. Pharmacological manipulation of these receptors has differential effects on sleep onset and sleep maintenance insomnia. Here we show that sleep is regulated by GABA in Drosophila and that a mutant GABA(A) receptor, Rdl(A302S), specifically decreases sleep latency. The drug carbamazepine (CBZ) has the opposite effect on sleep; it increases sleep latency as well as decreasing sleep. Behavioral and physiological experiments indicated that Rdl(A302S) mutant flies are resistant to the effects of CBZ on sleep latency and that mutant RDL(A302S) channels are resistant to the effects of CBZ on desensitization, respectively. These results suggest that this biophysical property of the channel, specifically channel desensitization, underlies the regulation of sleep latency in flies. These experiments uncouple the regulation of sleep latency from that of sleep duration and suggest that the kinetics of GABA(A) receptor signaling dictate sleep latency.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Canada 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 224 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 26%
Researcher 50 21%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 5%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 45 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 107 45%
Neuroscience 33 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 5%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 48 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2021.
All research outputs
#8,487,444
of 31,936,881 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#4,315
of 6,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,458
of 215,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#24
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,936,881 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 60.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.