↓ Skip to main content

Neurite arborization and mosaic spacing in the mouse retina require DSCAM

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Neurite arborization and mosaic spacing in the mouse retina require DSCAM
Published in
Nature, January 2008
DOI 10.1038/nature06514
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To establish functional circuitry, retinal neurons occupy spatial domains by arborizing their processes, which requires the self-avoidance of neurites from an individual cell, and by spacing their cell bodies, which requires positioning the soma and establishing a zone within which other cells of the same type are excluded. The mosaic patterns of distinct cell types form independently and overlap. The cues that direct these processes in the vertebrate retina are not known. Here we show that some types of retinal amacrine cells from mice with a spontaneous mutation in Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule (Dscam), a gene encoding an immunoglobulin-superfamily member adhesion molecule, have defects in the arborization of processes and in the spacing of cell bodies. In the mutant retina, cells that would normally express Dscam have hyperfasciculated processes, preventing them from creating an orderly arbor. Also, their cell bodies are randomly distributed or pulled into clumps rather than being regularly spaced mosaics. Our results indicate that mouse DSCAM mediates isoneuronal self-avoidance for arborization and heteroneuronal self-avoidance within specific cell types to prevent fasciculation and to preserve mosaic spacing. These functions are analogous to those of Drosophila DSCAM (ref. 6) and DSCAM2 (ref. 7). DSCAM may function similarly in other regions of the mammalian nervous system, and this role may extend to other members of the mammalian Dscam gene family.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 4%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 207 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 27%
Researcher 59 26%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 8%
Professor 16 7%
Student > Master 15 7%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 23 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 107 47%
Neuroscience 58 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 5%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 25 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2008.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#84,228
of 90,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,972
of 155,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#477
of 521 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 521 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.