↓ Skip to main content

Adenovirus Serotype 5 Hexon Mediates Liver Gene Transfer

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Adenovirus Serotype 5 Hexon Mediates Liver Gene Transfer
Published in
Cell, February 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.016
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Adenoviruses are used extensively as gene transfer agents, both experimentally and clinically. However, targeting of liver cells by adenoviruses compromises their potential efficacy. In cell culture, the adenovirus serotype 5 fiber protein engages the coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor (CAR) to bind cells. Paradoxically, following intravascular delivery, CAR is not used for liver transduction, implicating alternate pathways. Recently, we demonstrated that coagulation factor (F)X directly binds adenovirus leading to liver infection. Here, we show that FX binds to the Ad5 hexon, not fiber, via an interaction between the FX Gla domain and hypervariable regions of the hexon surface. Binding occurs in multiple human adenovirus serotypes. Liver infection by the FX-Ad5 complex is mediated through a heparin-binding exosite in the FX serine protease domain. This study reveals an unanticipated function for hexon in mediating liver gene transfer in vivo.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 221 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 20%
Researcher 32 14%
Student > Master 25 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 54 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 59 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 6%
Chemistry 5 2%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 62 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2025.
All research outputs
#2,445,480
of 29,186,775 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#6,592
of 18,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,957
of 193,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#19
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,186,775 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.