↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of mangrove forests in the Pacific region using Landsat imagery

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of mangrove forests in the Pacific region using Landsat imagery
Published in
Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, March 2011
DOI 10.1117/1.3563584
Authors

Bibek Bhattarai, Chandra Giri

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 1%
Unknown 82 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 20%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Other 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 23 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 27 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 7%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 27 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Remote Sensing
#109
of 430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,069
of 128,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Remote Sensing
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them