↓ Skip to main content

Structural mechanism of WASP activation by the enterohaemorrhagic E. coli effector EspFU

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Structural mechanism of WASP activation by the enterohaemorrhagic E. coli effector EspFU
Published in
Nature, July 2008
DOI 10.1038/nature07160
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

During infection, enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) takes over the actin cytoskeleton of eukaryotic cells by injecting the EspF(U) protein into the host cytoplasm. EspF(U) controls actin by activating members of the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP) family. Here we show that EspF(U) binds to the autoinhibitory GTPase binding domain (GBD) in WASP proteins and displaces it from the activity-bearing VCA domain (for verprolin homology, central hydrophobic and acidic regions). This interaction potently activates WASP and neural (N)-WASP in vitro and induces localized actin assembly in cells. In the solution structure of the GBD-EspF(U) complex, EspF(U) forms an amphipathic helix that binds the GBD, mimicking interactions of the VCA domain in autoinhibited WASP. Thus, EspF(U) activates WASP by competing directly for the VCA binding site on the GBD. This mechanism is distinct from that used by the eukaryotic activators Cdc42 and SH2 domains, which globally destabilize the GBD fold to release the VCA. Such diversity of mechanism in WASP proteins is distinct from other multimodular systems, and may result from the intrinsically unstructured nature of the isolated GBD and VCA elements. The structural incompatibility of the GBD complexes with EspF(U) and Cdc42/SH2, plus high-affinity EspF(U) binding, enable EHEC to hijack the eukaryotic cytoskeletal machinery effectively.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 2 2%
Mexico 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 83 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 22%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 5 6%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 11%
Chemistry 5 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 8 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2019.
All research outputs
#13,358,992
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#81,742
of 90,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,347
of 81,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#480
of 548 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 548 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.