↓ Skip to main content

High mitogenomic evolutionary rates and time dependency

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Genetics, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
High mitogenomic evolutionary rates and time dependency
Published in
Trends in Genetics, October 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.tig.2009.09.005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Using entire modern and ancient mitochondrial genomes of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) that are up to 44000 years old, we show that the rates of evolution of the mitochondrial genome are two to six times greater than those estimated from phylogenetic comparisons. Although the rate of evolution at constrained sites, including nonsynonymous positions and RNAs, varies more than twofold with time (between shallow and deep nodes), the rate of evolution at synonymous sites remains the same. The time-independent neutral evolutionary rates reported here would be useful for the study of recent evolutionary events.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 12 7%
Spain 3 2%
Brazil 3 2%
New Zealand 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Finland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 145 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 19%
Student > Master 20 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 9%
Professor 11 6%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 15 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 118 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 13%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 18 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2015.
All research outputs
#4,763,745
of 28,839,374 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Genetics
#799
of 2,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,242
of 117,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Genetics
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,839,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.