↓ Skip to main content

Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: One-Year Results of the Prospective, Multicenter NAVIGATE Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thoracic Oncology, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: One-Year Results of the Prospective, Multicenter NAVIGATE Study
Published in
Journal of Thoracic Oncology, November 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.11.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erik E. Folch, Michael A. Pritchett, Michael A. Nead, Mark R. Bowling, Septimiu D. Murgu, William S. Krimsky, Boris A. Murillo, Gregory P. LeMense, Douglas J. Minnich, Sandeep Bansal, Blesilda Q. Ellis, Amit K. Mahajan, Thomas R. Gildea, Rabih I. Bechara, Eric Sztejman, Javier Flandes, Otis B. Rickman, Sadia Benzaquen, D. Kyle Hogarth, Philip A. Linden, Momen M. Wahidi, Jennifer S. Mattingley, Kristin L. Hood, Haiying Lin, Jennifer J. Wolvers, Sandeep J. Khandhar, NAVIGATE Study Investigators, Carlos Anciano, Alejandro Aragaki, Douglas Arenberg, Omar Awais, Ricardo Balestra, Sandeep Bansal, Emanuela Barisione, Rabih Bechara, Sadia Benzaquen, Michela Bezzi, Krishnendu Bhadra, Julio Bird, Alessandro Blanco, Mark Bowling, Robert Cerfolio, Merete Christensen, Joseph Cicenia, Antony Courey, John Doty, Kevin Eggleston, Blesilda Ellis, Iker Fernandez, Javier Flandes, Erik Folch, Alexandre Furman, George David Gass, Thomas Gildea, Anil Gogineni, Musija Fikreta Grabcanovic, John David Hinze, David Kyle Hogarth, Raj Karunakara, Jordan Kazakov, Sandeep Khandhar, Sandhya Khurana, William Krimsky, Ganesh Krishna, Roman Krol, Roland Kropfmüller, Bernd Lamprecht, Kelvin Lau, Andrew Lee, Gregory LeMense, Philip Linden, Peter Lutz, Amit Mahajan, Kamran Mahmood, Fabien Maldonado, Rafael Martinez, Jennifer Mattingley, Douglas Minnich, Septimiu Murgu, Boris Murillo, Katie Nason, Michael Nead, Christopher Parks, Kenneth Perret, Peter Porsch, Michael Pritchett, Otis Rickman, Maydee Rosario, Mario Salio, Saiyad Sarkar, Andrew Seevaratnam, Sonali Sethi, Jaspal Singh, Michael Studnicka, Eric Sztejman, Tamejiro Takubo, Catalina Teba, Christopher Towe, Marco Trigiani, JeanRichel Vergnon, Niels-Erik Viby, Momen Wahidi, Ernest Waller, Benjamin Wei, Dragos Zanchi, Michael Zgoda

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 184 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 17 9%
Other 16 9%
Researcher 14 8%
Student > Master 12 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 7%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 78 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 35%
Engineering 9 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 87 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2025.
All research outputs
#1,477,888
of 33,087,078 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thoracic Oncology
#236
of 4,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,997
of 481,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thoracic Oncology
#5
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,087,078 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.