↓ Skip to main content

Varus and valgus alignment and incident and progressive knee osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
501 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Varus and valgus alignment and incident and progressive knee osteoarthritis
Published in
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, May 2010
DOI 10.1136/ard.2010.129742
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Varus and valgus alignment increase medial and lateral tibiofemoral load. Alignment was associated with tibiofemoral osteoarthritis progression in previous studies; an effect on incident osteoarthritis risk is less certain. This study tested whether alignment influences the risk of incident and progressive radiographic tibiofemoral osteoarthritis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 501 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Finland 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 492 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 14%
Student > Bachelor 56 11%
Student > Master 49 10%
Researcher 43 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 6%
Other 84 17%
Unknown 170 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 150 30%
Engineering 50 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 7%
Sports and Recreations 24 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 2%
Other 29 6%
Unknown 202 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,507,433
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#3,761
of 10,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,600
of 152,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#46
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,607 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.