↓ Skip to main content

Cysteine-Activated Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) Donors

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Chemical Society, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
13 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cysteine-Activated Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) Donors
Published in
Journal of the American Chemical Society, December 2010
DOI 10.1021/ja1085723
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

H(2)S, the newly discovered gasotransmitter, plays important roles in biological systems. However, the research on H(2)S has been hindered by the lack of controllable H(2)S donors that could mimic the slow and continuous H(2)S generation process in vivo. Herein we report a series of cysteine-activated H(2)S donors. Structural modifications of these molecules can regulate the rates of H(2)S generation. These compounds can be useful tools in H(2)S research.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 2 2%
Poland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 127 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 30%
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Master 17 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 20 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 59 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 25 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,496,224
of 33,729,289 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#5,272
of 87,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,667
of 250,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#10
of 334 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,729,289 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 87,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 334 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.