↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic accuracy of leptospirosis whole-cell lateral flow assays: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Microbiology and Infection, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Diagnostic accuracy of leptospirosis whole-cell lateral flow assays: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Clinical Microbiology and Infection, November 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.11.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 29 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 30 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2019.
All research outputs
#19,954,338
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Microbiology and Infection
#3,852
of 4,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#323,458
of 446,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Microbiology and Infection
#57
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.