↓ Skip to main content

Indolent CD8+ lymphoid proliferation of the ear: report of two cases and review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cutaneous Pathology, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Indolent CD8+ lymphoid proliferation of the ear: report of two cases and review of the literature
Published in
Journal of Cutaneous Pathology, November 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2010.01647.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Indolent CD8+ lymphoid proliferation of the ear is a recently described cutaneous lymphoid proliferation that clinically presents with slow growing lesion(s) on the ear(s). In cases reported to date, there has been indolent clinical behavior and no evidence of systemic involvement. Characteristic histopathologic features include a non-epidermotropic diffuse dermal infiltrate of CD8+ T-lymphocytes with a lymphoblast-like appearance. T-cell clonality has also been observed. Herein, we present two patients who show clinical, histopathologic and immunophenotypic features similar to the original index cases described by Petrella et al. In addition, we review the literature regarding this unusual lymphoid proliferation and provide evidence that this entity represents a phenotypic variant of primary cutaneous CD4+ small/medium-sized pleomorphic T-cell lymphoma, a concept proposed by Beltraminelli et al. in 2009. Differentiation between this lymphoproliferative process and other more aggressive CD8+ lymphomas is essential in avoiding excessive treatment of a condition that combines worrisome histopathology with indolent clinical behavior.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 67%
Computer Science 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2025.
All research outputs
#10,074,637
of 33,087,078 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cutaneous Pathology
#404
of 1,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,396
of 241,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cutaneous Pathology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,087,078 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them