↓ Skip to main content

Case Scheduling Preferences of One Surgeon's Cataract Surgery Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesia and analgesia, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Case Scheduling Preferences of One Surgeon's Cataract Surgery Patients
Published in
Anesthesia and analgesia, February 2009
DOI 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818f1651
Pubmed ID
Authors

Franklin Dexter, Lee Birchansky, James M. Bernstein, Ruth E. Wachtel

Abstract

The increase in the number of operating rooms nationwide in the United States may reflect preferences of patients for scheduling of outpatient surgery. Yet, little is known of the importance that patients place on scheduling convenience and flexibility.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Researcher 5 17%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 10 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 17%
Engineering 5 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2009.
All research outputs
#24,360,769
of 33,937,515 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesia and analgesia
#8,767
of 10,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,955
of 249,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesia and analgesia
#58
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,937,515 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.