↓ Skip to main content

Designing Drug Trials for Frailty: ICFSR Task Force 2018

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Frailty & Aging, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Designing Drug Trials for Frailty: ICFSR Task Force 2018
Published in
The Journal of Frailty & Aging, July 2018
DOI 10.14283/jfa.2018.20
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To reduce disability and dependence in older adults, frailty may represent an appropriate target for intervention. While preventing frailty through lifestyle interventions may be the optimal public health approach for many population groups, pharmacological approaches will likely be needed for individuals who meet frailty criteria or who have comorbid conditions that contribute to and complicate the frailty syndrome, and for those who are not compliant with lifestyle interventions. Barriers to successful development of drug treatments for frailty include variability in how the frailty syndrome is defined, lack of agreement on the best diagnostic tools and outcome measures, and the paucity of sensitive, reliable, and validated biomarkers. The International Conference on Frailty and Sarcopenia Research Task Force met in Miami, Florida, on February 28, 2018, to consider the status of treatments under development for frailty and discuss potential strategies for advancing the field. They concluded that at the present time, there may be a more productive regulatory pathway for adjuvant treatments or trials targeting specific functional outcomes such as gait speed. They also expressed optimism that several studies currently underway may provide the insight needed to advance drug development for frailty.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 23 49%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Sports and Recreations 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 25 53%