↓ Skip to main content

Variants in ADCY5 and near CCNL1 are associated with fetal growth and birth weight

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Variants in ADCY5 and near CCNL1 are associated with fetal growth and birth weight
Published in
Nature Genetics, April 2010
DOI 10.1038/ng.567
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To identify genetic variants associated with birth weight, we meta-analyzed six genome-wide association (GWA) studies (n = 10,623 Europeans from pregnancy/birth cohorts) and followed up two lead signals in 13 replication studies (n = 27,591). rs900400 near LEKR1 and CCNL1 (P = 2 x 10(-35)) and rs9883204 in ADCY5 (P = 7 x 10(-15)) were robustly associated with birth weight. Correlated SNPs in ADCY5 were recently implicated in regulation of glucose levels and susceptibility to type 2 diabetes, providing evidence that the well-described association between lower birth weight and subsequent type 2 diabetes has a genetic component, distinct from the proposed role of programming by maternal nutrition. Using data from both SNPs, we found that the 9% of Europeans carrying four birth weight-lowering alleles were, on average, 113 g (95% CI 89-137 g) lighter at birth than the 24% with zero or one alleles (P(trend) = 7 x 10(-30)). The impact on birth weight is similar to that of a mother smoking 4-5 cigarettes per day in the third trimester of pregnancy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
United States 3 1%
Norway 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 205 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 16%
Professor 22 10%
Student > Master 19 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 4%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 50 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 12%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 60 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2026.
All research outputs
#2,373,800
of 33,276,949 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#3,159
of 8,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,291
of 139,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#10
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,276,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.