↓ Skip to main content

System thinking applied to near misses: a review of industry-wide near miss reporting systems

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 197)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
System thinking applied to near misses: a review of industry-wide near miss reporting systems
Published in
Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, December 2018
DOI 10.1080/1463922x.2018.1484527
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 32 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Computer Science 4 5%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 37 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2020.
All research outputs
#4,921,270
of 34,582,852 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science
#17
of 197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,664
of 490,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,582,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 490,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.