↓ Skip to main content

Unique Environmental Effects on Physical Activity Participation: A Twin Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Unique Environmental Effects on Physical Activity Participation: A Twin Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0002019
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The health benefits of regular physical activity are well established. However, the relative contribution of heritable and environmental factors to physical activity participation remains controversial. Using a cut-point of 60 minutes of total activity per week, data from the GenomEUtwin project revealed consistent genetic influence on physical activity participation in 37,051 twin pairs from seven countries. We hypothesized that the heritability of physical activity participation would be attenuated using the CDC/ACSM recommended minimum threshold of 150 minutes of moderate intensity activity per week.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 22%
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Master 7 12%
Professor 4 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 5%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 10 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 14%
Social Sciences 7 12%
Psychology 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 14 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2008.
All research outputs
#7,589,919
of 34,404,538 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#72,137
of 224,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,248
of 121,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#174
of 390 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,404,538 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 390 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.