↓ Skip to main content

Mars Pathfinder spectral measurements of Phobos and Deimos: Comparison with previous data

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geophysical Research, April 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mars Pathfinder spectral measurements of Phobos and Deimos: Comparison with previous data
Published in
Journal of Geophysical Research, April 1999
DOI 10.1029/98je02248
Authors

Scott Murchie, Nick Thomas, Daniel Britt, Ken Herkenhoff, James F. Bell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 6%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 34%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 41%
Physics and Astronomy 8 25%
Engineering 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Unknown 7 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#4,077
of 12,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,943
of 37,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#28
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.