You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An experimental comparison of composite and grab sampling of stream water for metagenetic analysis of environmental DNA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PeerJ, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.7717/peerj.5871 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert S. Cornman, James E. McKenna, Jennifer Fike, Sara J. Oyler-McCance, Robin Johnson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 19% |
| Researcher | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 12% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2018.
All research outputs
#17,998,897
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from PeerJ
#10,285
of 13,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,814
of 437,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PeerJ
#340
of 456 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 456 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.