A significant amount of evidence indicates that some antidepressants have an analgesic effect. We wished to determine whether this analgesic effect could be demonstrated in studies that had used antidepressants for the treatment of pain in patients diagnosed with psychogenic pain or somatoform pain disorder. Meta-analysis was used for this purpose.
All randomized, placebo-controlled antidepressant treatment studies of patients diagnosed with psychogenic pain disorder or somatoform pain disorder were isolated. These studies were reviewed and relevant statistics were coded. For each study, a single p value for the drug/placebo comparison was found or calculated for pain change scores from pretreatment to completion of treatment. The z scores and effect sizes were calculated for each study, followed by a calculation of an overall z score and effect size.
Eleven studies fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria for this meta-analysis. The combined difference showed that antidepressants decreased pain intensity in patients with psychogenic pain or somatoform pain disorder significantly more than placebo (z = 5.71, p<.0001). The overall effect size was large (mean = 0.48) and ranged from 0 to 0.91.
The results indicate that, in patients diagnosed with psychogenic pain or somatoform pain disorder, antidepressant treatment resulted in a reduction in pain that was significantly greater than that of placebo. Possible explanations for these results are discussed.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,447,794
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Biopsychosocial Science and Medicine (BSAM)
#1,020
of 2,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,686
of 132,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biopsychosocial Science and Medicine (BSAM)
#21
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
