You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ハズバンダリートレーニングを用いた研究の可能性
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.5686/jjzwm.23.59 |
| Authors |
Kazuyuki BAN, Syunichi SHIIHARA |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,199,914
of 24,973,800 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine
#16
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,395
of 347,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,973,800 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.