↓ Skip to main content

mTOR-Raptor Binds and Activates SGK1 to Regulate p27 Phosphorylation

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cell, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
mTOR-Raptor Binds and Activates SGK1 to Regulate p27 Phosphorylation
Published in
Molecular Cell, June 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.027
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The cell-cycle effects of mTORC1 are not fully understood. We provide evidence that mTOR-raptor phosphorylates SGK1 to modulate p27 function. Cellular mTOR activation, by refeeding of amino acid-deprived cells or by TSC2 shRNA, activated SGK1 and p27 phosphorylation at T157, and both were inhibited by short-term rapamycin treatment and by SGK1 shRNA. mTOR overexpression activated both Akt and SGK1, causing TGF-beta resistance through impaired nuclear import and cytoplasmic accumulation of p27. Rapamycin or raptor shRNA impaired mTOR-driven p70 and SGK1 activation, but not that of Akt, and decreased cytoplasmic p27. mTOR/raptor/SGK1 complexes were detected in cells. mTOR phosphorylated SGK1, but not SGK1-S422A, in vitro. SGK1 phosphorylated p27 in vitro. These data implicate SGK1 as an mTORC1 (mTOR-raptor) substrate. mTOR may promote G1 progression in part through SGK1 activation and deregulate the cell cycle in cancers through both Akt- and SGK-mediated p27 T157 phosphorylation and cytoplasmic p27 mislocalization.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Chile 2 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 173 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 22%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Master 12 6%
Professor 11 6%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 40 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 8%
Chemistry 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 44 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2024.
All research outputs
#4,537,458
of 34,054,827 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cell
#3,759
of 8,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,439
of 137,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cell
#12
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,054,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.