↓ Skip to main content

Predicting microbial nitrogen pathways from basic principles

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Microbiology, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Predicting microbial nitrogen pathways from basic principles
Published in
Environmental Microbiology, March 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02450.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Nitrogen compounds are transformed by a complicated network of competing geochemical processes or microbial pathways, each performed by a different ecological guild of microorganisms. Complete experimental unravelling of this network requires a prohibitive experimental effort. Here we present a simple model that predicts relative rates of hypothetical nitrogen pathways, based only on the stoichiometry and energy yield of the performed redox reaction, assuming competition for resources between alternative pathways. Simulating competing pathways in hypothetical freshwater and marine sediment situations, we surprisingly found that much of the variation observed in nature can simply be predicted from these basic principles. Investigating discrepancies between observations and predictions led to two important biochemical factors that may create barriers for the viability of pathways: enzymatic costs for long pathways and high ammonium activation energy. We hypothesize that some discrepancies can be explained by non-equilibrium dynamics. The model predicted a pathway that has not been discovered in nature yet: the dismutation of nitrite to the level of nitrate and dinitrogen gas.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 14 6%
Germany 3 1%
Japan 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 187 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 23%
Researcher 51 23%
Student > Master 33 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 6%
Professor 11 5%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 23 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 31%
Environmental Science 63 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 26 12%
Engineering 10 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 37 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2011.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiology
#3,595
of 4,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,276
of 119,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiology
#26
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.