| Title |
The Clinical Doctorate: A Framework for Analysis in Physical Therapist Education
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Physical Therapy, June 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1093/ptj/79.6.567 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
This article explores major considerations for analysis and discussion of the role of the clinical doctorate as the first professional degree in physical therapist education (DPT). A process for this analysis is posed based on a conceptual framework developed by Stark, Lowther, Hagerty, and Orczyk through grounded theory research on professional education. External influences from society and the profession, institutional and programmatic influences, and articulation of critical dimensions of professional competence and professional attitudes as major categories are discussed in relation to the DPT. A series of questions generated from the application of the model are put forth for continued discussion and deliberation concerning the DPT. We conclude that the DPT provides the best pathway to serve society, the patient, and the profession. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 22% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 24% |