↓ Skip to main content

Crystallographic, Spectroscopic, and Computational Analysis of a Flavin C4a−Oxygen Adduct in Choline Oxidase ,

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemistry, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Crystallographic, Spectroscopic, and Computational Analysis of a Flavin C4a−Oxygen Adduct in Choline Oxidase ,
Published in
Biochemistry, January 2009
DOI 10.1021/bi801918u
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Flavin C4a-OO(H) and C4a-OH adducts are critical intermediates proposed in many flavoenzyme reaction mechanisms, but they are rarely detected even by rapid transient kinetics methods. We observe a trapped flavin C4a-OH or C4a-OO(H) adduct by single-crystal spectroscopic methods and in the 1.86 A resolution X-ray crystal structure of choline oxidase. The microspectrophotometry results show that the adduct forms rapidly in situ at 100 K upon exposure to X-rays. Density functional theory calculations establish the electronic structures for the flavin C4a-OH and C4a-OO(H) adducts and estimate the stabilization energy of several active site hydrogen bonds deduced from the crystal structure. We propose that the enzyme-bound FAD is reduced in the X-ray beam. The aerobic crystals then form either a C4a-OH or C4a-OO(H) adduct, but an insufficient proton inventory prevents their decay at cryogenic temperatures.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 32%
Chemistry 9 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2009.
All research outputs
#16,584,772
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from Biochemistry
#19,526
of 22,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,627
of 178,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemistry
#91
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,293 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.