↓ Skip to main content

Fast live simultaneous multiwavelength four-dimensional optical microscopy

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
patent
2 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
377 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Fast live simultaneous multiwavelength four-dimensional optical microscopy
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2010
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1004037107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 377 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
France 6 2%
United Kingdom 5 1%
Germany 5 1%
Japan 4 1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Taiwan 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Czechia 2 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 332 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 122 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 99 26%
Professor 22 6%
Student > Master 22 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 22 6%
Other 46 12%
Unknown 44 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 156 41%
Physics and Astronomy 56 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 13%
Engineering 32 8%
Chemistry 10 3%
Other 27 7%
Unknown 48 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,317,071
of 34,763,505 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#27,463
of 119,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,019
of 152,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#123
of 702 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,763,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 702 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.